Why Intel's social media policy is a really big deal. Really.
| By Intel, policy on Dec. 11, 2008 | Tweet |
It’s rare that any corporate policy makes for a good read, but trust me when I tell you that Intel’s new Social Media Guidelines are barn-burning fare.
Here’s why:
Standard business model: No matter how many people work at a company, only a select few employees are allowed to speak to the public. All statements must be approved by the top brass, who will be sure to suck the life out of any comment until it sounds like good-old corporate PR dreck.
The Intel model: Any employee can speak to the public. And the more interesting your perspective, the better.
This week, Intel announced its new approach to the world by posting its Social Media Guidelines online. And while there are plenty of caveats to ensure that employees respect Intel’s privacy policy and other rules, there’s no denying that this is an astounding bit of empowerment.
What’s incredible is that Intel isn’t just allowing workers to use social media for work purposes; it’s encouraging them to be themselves while doing so.
Here’s a telling excerpt:
• Provide unique, individual perspectives on what's going on at Intel and in the world.
• Post meaningful, respectful comments - in other words, no spam and no remarks that are off-topic or offensive.
• Reply to comments quickly, when a response is appropriate.
• Respect proprietary information and confidentiality.
• When disagreeing with others' opinions, keep it cool.
• Know and follow the Intel Code of Conduct and the Intel Privacy Policy
After the jump, I go over a few more of my favorite bits.
On transparency:
On perception:
On starting conversations:
On sharing:
On mistakes:
On negative comments from the public:
Again, this isn’t a carte blanche for employees to run roughshod across the social Web, calling themselves Intel reps. And I always wonder how much legal security is gained when people post disclaimers such as Intel’s recommended wording: “The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent Intel's positions, strategies or opinions.”
But Intel is still light years ahead of most companies. At a time when many businesses are considering (or already are) banning the use of social media in the workplace, Intel is entrusting its employees to do what’s right.
| Tweet | Share |

I was employed in communications at Intel when they first started experimenting with Social Media (~2003). It was incredible - after we managed to get a corporate blogosphere, there were employees whose blog posts got more traffic than the CEOs webcasts. Good to see that the company as a whole has caught on and is embracing it for external conversations as well.
Posted by: Eric Housh | December 12, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Since it appears typepad ate my first comment, I'll try again. I warn you, the first one was probably WAY more insightful!
>Post meaningful, respectful comments - in other words, no spam and no remarks that are off-topic or offensive.
I think this policy is a good one, for perhaps a different reason than it was intended.
Yes, Intel wants people who are representing their organization to do so in a good light. Yet this is also a great way for people to train themselves on how to act online. Many people may still not realize how visible their online activities are or the possible long-term implications. Taking that extra moment to wonder "is this acceptable in the eyes of my employer" may help people learn to moderate their own behaviour as well.
Posted by: Andrea Hill | December 12, 2008 at 10:29 AM
This is soooo cool, just what my organisation needed! Thanks David for this great post.
In fact, 99% can be totally adopted by most organisations that claims to be passionate, progressive, innovative, empowering, etc. etc...
I will be honest here. I work for Oxfam Hong Kong. And I am also administrator for Oxfam's facebook groups including Oxfam Trailwalker. There you go. I like being honest.
Posted by: Juliana | December 12, 2008 at 11:49 AM
Your blog rocks. I'm so glad I found it... this is an awesome post. I'll be using it as a case study.
Posted by: Ms. Single Mama | December 12, 2008 at 03:25 PM
Good stuff but Intel is not alone here. Check out IBM's version: http://www.ibm.com/blogs/zz/en/guidelines.html
Posted by: Lorenzo Freschet | December 13, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Yes I thought the exact same thing when I read it...
IBM's is good too.
Posted by: Adam Singer | December 14, 2008 at 09:49 AM
http://crazylegz.blogspot.com/2008/12/social-mediaintel.html
Hey Dave, I did a short post on your piece, it's all in Chinese though. Just so you know.
Posted by: crazylegz | December 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Hmm it is like democratic model in PR....
Posted by: ERM | May 20, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Nice article and thanks for sharing your thoughts. I firmly believe that every organization big or small should have a social media policy. Recently I completed an analysis on usage of social media and its impact on productivity and have published my findings here http://www.gigathoughts.com/social-media/do-you-have-a-social-media-policy-for-your-organization.html
Hope you guys find it useful and also do let me know your views on the same
Posted by: Amit Desai | August 04, 2009 at 06:05 AM
This database contains links to more than 60 social media policies, and you can filter by industry:
http://socialmediagovernance.com/policies.php
Posted by: Chris Boudreaux | August 20, 2009 at 12:15 AM
I will be honest here. I work for Oxfam Hong Kong. http://en.newdosug.ru There you go. I like being honest.
Posted by: Igor Sauna | October 17, 2009 at 11:54 AM